Printed from www.nzmeccano.com
Part 129: Rack segment
129 | Rack Segment | 1920 | 1952 | 4 | 4 | ''Toothed segment'' post-war |
The parts
The Rack Segment was first announced in the January 1921 Meccano Magazine, although we can probably be sure that it was available before that date as most Meccano Magazine announcements were several months late. It didn't find its way into outfits until late in 1924, when four were included in the largest outfit 7. These continued into outfit L, and one was included in the pre-war outfit 10.
Four of these segments make up a 3 inch diameter gear, which is a very odd size for Meccano, although it should be remembered that at the time of its introduction the largest gear was the 1½'' 56-tooth gear (the 3½'' gear didn't arrive until 1924). If it were to be at 38dp (like the majority of gears were), this would make 114 teeth, and therefore 28½ per segment. In fact, rack segments seem to be quite variable in their design, but the majority of the examples seen are cut just after the point of the 'end' tooth. This means that they won't fit together snugly, and if you attempt to make a complete wheel you need to be prepared to try different rack segments, and tweak their spacing within the tolerances of the holes to allow the teeth to line up well. You can very occasionally end up with 115 or 116 teeth this way.
The photo to the left shows how variable the ends can be – the join on the left is good, but the join on the right is terrible and needs opening up in order to avoid jamming. Fortunately, only one rack segment is needed for most applications.
This image does not belong to the webmasters and is copyright.
Please do not download or copy it for any purpose. It has been
kindly provided for use on this site by the image owner,
Ed Barclay
Chronological variations
It is often thought that the part was dropped at the close of production in 1941, but in fact it did reappear for a time in blackened steel (stamped Meccano Made in England). It appears in the parts listing on the back of the manuals between 1945 and 1952 as either "Toothed segment" or "Toothed segments". It is missing from the 1953 manuals, which counts as quietly dropping the part, I suppose.
Although it has been suggested that very early 10 outfits contained the toothed segment, no examples have yet been found. The 1949 manual for outfit 10 was a close copy of the pre-war manuals, and still had the cross-hatching on the photographs. Model 10.13 "Ambulance" calls for this part as the steering rack.
This image does not belong to the webmasters and is copyright.
Please do not download or copy it for any purpose. It has been
kindly provided for use on this site by the image owner,
John Nuttall
Click on this image to see a larger version.
Here's a rare and interesting bit of paperwork. The letter to the right (click on the picture to enlarge it) is from Meccano Ltd, dated 23rd August 1953, explaining that "The contents of Outfit No.10 were changed when production was resumed after the war and the Toothed Segment included in the pre-war Outfits was withdrawn...". The recipient had complained that his 9a outfit didn't include part 129. So we can be fairly sure that the outfits didn't have them, but we also can't find any reference to part 129 as a spare part. The last known mention of it being available is in the Australian price list of August 1942 (at 15/5 per dozen). Post-war price lists of June 1950 show it as "not yet available", and yet in the next price list in October 1950 the part has disappeared. We haven't yet found a dealer pack of these, and so black rack segments are a bit of a mystery. If you know something, please tell us!
John Nuttall, our resident Meccano Magazine scrutineer, has spotted this article in the February 1950 Meccano Magazine, in which there is an updated version of "How to use Meccano Parts" for the Toothed Segment. In three separate pictures, two shown to the right, the toothed segments are clearly black rather than nickel plated. So, although they were advertised as "not yet available", they certainly existed at this time, at least in the model room.
I have checked two separate 1939 outfit 10s of reasonably good provenance, and both of them contain nickel-plated Rack Segments, with the stampings Meccano and Reg. No. 680416. This proves that the nickel ones were certainly current at that date.
Rack segments can be dated to some extent by examining the stamping of the parts very early ones have only the Meccano stamp, with the MFEA being added for the majority of the 1920s. As very low volume parts, however, it is unwise to rely on these stampings, as Meccano may have had several years' supply of them in stock at any one time.
Variations and oddities
None known.
Dealer spare parts boxes
These are certainly rare, but should be out there somewhere. Does anyone have a picture? Post-war 'toothed segments' as spare parts would appear wrapped in brown paper, I should imagine.
Individual part numbers
Part numbers for the parts on this page are as follows: Unique part numbersFor identification, each variation has been given a suffix to the main Meccano part number. These suffixes consist of a two-character code for the colour, and if there are many variations, a further number and sometimes letter code to identify each variation. See the bottom of the 'Parts' page for further details.
You don't need to worry what the codes are, just click on any one for a photograph.
The button above turns on and off the display of DMS numbers (where they are known). The DMS (Development of the Meccano System, Hauton and Hindemarsh) published in 1972 and added to in 75 and 82, suggested part numbers for every variation of every Meccano part. These numbers aren't perfect, but they are recognised and also referenced in the EMP (Encyclopedia of Meccano Parts, Don Blakeborough).
Description | from | 129 |
---|---|---|
Nickel plated | 20 | .ni |
Blackened steel 'toothed segment' | 49 | .bs |
ALL |
Please send us pictures of missing parts! Hints and tips for pictures
Take a picture of the part in very good light, preferably on a plain yellow background, without a flash but with a tripod.
Ideally, trim the picture to about 150 pixels per inch of the Meccano part (unless the part is particularly big or small), save it as a reasonably good quality jpg file with a filename of exactly the part number, for example 19b.ni1.jpg, and email it to us by clicking on 'Contact us' at the top of the page. Thanks!
- A greyed-out box shows that no part exists for that colour combination.
- Part number codes with a green background have an attached picture of the part, just click once on the code to show a photograph of that part in a separate window.
- Parts marked "" were temporary or economy parts, or existed only within specific themed outfits. The previous part continued throughout or afterwards.
Further information
Total number of messages on this page: 9. This is page 1 of 2.
Richarrd Dawes (at 3:07pm, Tue 7th Aug, 12) |
I have a number of very thin segments (ca. 1/16" thick) stamped Meccano, they are poorly plated with the nickel skin lifting and a lot of rust too. I assumed them to be WW1 economy production items, but if these weren't produced until 1921 what would their history be? FYI I also have some 50 and 56 tooth gears made of steel with similar guage metal for the disk. Presumably these are later than WW1 too. |
Enrique Giménez (at 3:16am, Thu 10th May, 12) |
Hell. I have a 129 piece without teeth. Possibly a manufacturing flaw. Best regards. Enrique Giménez (egimenez@ono.com) |
Derek Willetts (at 4:21am, Fri 28th May, 10) |
Have you noticed the photo of the rack segment meshing with the 1" spur gear part 31 will create an intermittent mechanism as the pivot point is one hole too far from the true centre. It will not rotate for 90 Degrees fully meshed. |
paul, woolwich, england (at 3:38pm, Fri 19th Feb, 10) |
I've built the ambulance about six months ago. I used a toothed segment because I had one and thought any substitution would have been difficult. This model has always 'concerned' me. It is easily possible within the compass of the set to fit geerbox, transmission and differential. Why is it so mechanistically simple? |
Albert Edward (at 7:33am, Sat 16th Jan, 10) |
Very interesting letter, thank you. Although it is difficult to make out the words, it would appear that the letter states that the withdrawn part 129 had been "replaced with other parts". Does anybody know what parts these might have been? |
Olliver (at 4:02pm, Sat 9th Jan, 10) |
Yes. The stringing part is an important piece of evidence which points to there being two bevels in this outfit. I am now going to check all my stringing cards for any other anomalies. I can hardly contain the excitement. It beats going to the football every time! |